Historical Perspective in Consumer Research: National and International  Perspectives, 1985     Pages 51-55
    AFRICAN AND EUROPEAN ROOTS OF MULTICULTURALISM IN THE CONSUMER BEHAVIOR  OF AMERICAN BLACKS
    Jerome D. Williams, University of Colorado
        [Jerome  D. Williams is a Doctoral Candidate in the Department of  Marketing,  University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 and Assistant Professor of  Marketing,  Metropolitan State College, Denver, CO 80204.]
    ABSTRACT - 
    This  review traces the development of African and European value systems as  evidenced  in the consumer behavior of American blacks. Using the  concept of multiculturalism, an  explanation is given as to why there is  confusion in the literature over cultural  integration versus cultural  distinctiveness.
    INTRODUCTION
    Blacks  in rhe United States constitute over 12% of the population and  spend  over $150 billion annually (Spadoni 1984). There is no denying the  importance of  this market segment, both to researchers and  practitioners. More consumer studies have  been conducted with blacks as  subjects than with any other minority ethnic group (Bauer  and  Cunningham 1970, Sexton 1972). Despite this plethora of academic  research (Bafry,  Harvey, and McGill 1976), many marketing practitioners  view programs aimed at blacks as  proceeding at little better "than a  snail's pace" (Yovovich 1982) and  characterize much of the research as  being too scarce, outdated, unreliable, or  non-existent (Andreasen  1978).
    Part of the problem is that while most  marketers and consumer behavior  researchers are in general agreement  that the consumer behavior of blacks differs from  that of whites, there  is no consensus as to the cause of the difference. The controversy   seems to center around the issue of whether such differences are the  result of cultural  factors or relative socioeconomic status (Moschis  and Moore 1981). Some contend that when  socioeconomic variables are  held constant, very few differences are observed. Others  maintain that  even when comparisons of blacks and whites of equal socioeconomic status  are  made, there are still observed consumer behavior differences which  can be attributed to  culture.
    In addition,  there is confusion as to the motivation of blacks, even when  there is  agreement that the differences are attributed to culture. For example,  some  researchers suggest that blacks will attempt to emulate whites,  particularly as they move  up the socioeconomic ladder. Other  researchers suggest that blacks who move up the  socioeconomic scale  become less concerned-about being accepted or striving to be like   whites. This is because the higher position of blacks allows them to do  whatever they  choose, and for many, this means identifying strongly  with the black subculture.  Robertson, Zielinski, and Ward (1984)  describe this as the dichotomy in subcultural  motivations between the  preference for cultural integration versus cultural  distinctiveness. It  becomes a question of how much blacks desire assimilation and   integration compared to how much they desire a separate identity and  maintenance of a  distinct cultural heritage.
    This  paper will examine this conflict using the concept of  multiculturalism  based on African and European roots. Multiculturalism can be helpful in   explaining how African and European perspectives have merged and how  both affect black  consumers. This offers a resolution of the cultural  integration versus distinctiveness  question. Past research has been  based on the assumption that as one becomes more  acculturated that one  loses cultural identity. However, this paper is based on the premise   that American blacks can maintain strong ethnic identity based on  African roots and  simultaneously exhibit behavior based on the European  values of the dominant culture.
    PREVIOUS RESEARCH
    A  number of studies have commented on the cultural integration versus   distinctiveness issue in the behavior of blacks compared to whites.  During the 1960's and  early 1970's, the dominant view was that blacks  had a desire for cultural integration. It  was assumed blacks wanted to  be like whites and that they consumed in a manner which  reflected a  desire for assimilation into the total culture.
    Bullock  (1961) stated that blacks "attempt to surround themselves  with symbols  of whiteness." Bauer and Cunningham (1970) stressed that blacks are   "fighting to attain full membership in American society," and they use   consumption of a socially visible nature as a means of showing that they  have arrived. In  dividing blacks into "strivers" and "nonstrivers,"  Bauer and  Cunningham found that "strivers" were more likely to accept  values  characteristic of whites and to emulate white consumer behavior.
    Bennett  and Kassarjian (1972) suggested that when socioeconomic status was   held constant there was little difference between black and white  consumer behavior. They  indicated that blacks use white norms as a  guide to expenditures to provide status in the  dominant culture.
    During  the late 1970's and into the 1980's, there was more emphasis placed  on  cultural distinctiveness compared to earlier research. Blauner (1972)  suggests that  during the 1960's, blacks became increasingly concerned  with their culture and  aggressively substituted their own ethnic  alternatives for dominant standards of beauty,  behavior, and value,  many of which were rejected as "white." Gibson (1978) feels  there is  little likelihood in the near future of the black community being  assimilated  into the white community. He states that as blacks move up  the socioeconomic ladder, they  no longer are concerned about emulating  whites but become more aware of expressing  "black consciousness."
    Gibson's  reference to income's being an important variable in the cultural   integration versus distinctiveness has been cited by others. Karon  (1958) felt that among  lower income blacks there was little pressure to  conform to middle class standards, but  for upper income blacks, it was  important to match the accepted white ideal, and much of  the behavior  of upper income blacks was directed towards that end. Bauer and  Cunningham's  (1970) "strivers" were middle class blacks while the  "non-strivers"  were the lower class blacks. Feldman and Star (1968)  found shopping patterns of blacks and  whites with incomes over $5000 to  be very similar while substantial differences existed  between blacks  and whites with incomes less than $5000.
    Ness and  Smith (1984) conducted research that supported earlier findings  of  Darden (1977) and Frazier (1957) that middle class blacks tend to  embrace middle class  attributes and values to an even greater extent  than do whites. Yovovich (1982) reported  on research that found that  the differences between better educated, more affluent blacks  and lower  income, less educated blacks is greater than between middle class  blacks and  whites. In harmony with this, Kochman (1981) suggests that  the black cultural perspective  will be more prevalent among blacks at a  lower socioeconomic level than among middle or  upper income blacks,  which follows the reasoning of Herskovits (1941).
    Another  factor is age. Bauer, Cunningham, and Wortzel (1965) indicated  that  younger blacks might adopt white middle class values less so than older  blacks.  Isaacs (1963) commented on the "black awareness" movement and  activism among  younger blacks relative to the fatalism of older blacks.  Blauner (1972) feels the emphasis  on black identity was largely a  project of the younger generation, and it pervaded the  black ethnic  group as a whole and affected the entire society.
    MULTICULTURALISM
    Due  to the discrepancy in the literature regarding whether blacks desire   to behave like whites or differently from whites, this paper proposes  that the concept of  multiculturalism might provide a way to explain  these conflicting results. Rather than  attempting to show that blacks  desire to exhibit behavior following values of strong  ethnic identity  or desire to behave in a manner that emulates whites, the multicultural   concept says that blacks can display both behaviors. Because blacks in  America have  descended from African ancestry, it is reasonable to  assume that elements of the African  cultural heritage and its values  have continued to have an impact on the present behavior  of American  blacks. However, it is also reasonable to assume that after being  submerged in  the dominant white culture with its European-based culture  and values that blacks also  exhibit behavior reflecting those  elements. Blacks become like an ambidextrous athlete, or  a switch  hitter in baseball, capable of employing the behavioral style for which  the  situation calls.
    Ramirez and Castaneda  (1974) define multiculturalism as the ability to  exhibit behavior based  on extensive socialization and life experiences in two or more   cultures. The multicultural person is capable of actively participating  in these cultures  and interacting with members of these sociocultural  groups. The behavior of the  multicultural person is flexible in that  the person can be adaptable in employing the  appropriate style for a  variety of different environments demanded by the different  cultures.
    The  reason this may seem foreign to many consumer behavior researchers who   have examined black behavior is that acculturation has traditionally  been viewed as a  linear concept. Acculturation is treated as the polar  opposite of ethnicity. In many  studies ethnic individuals are  categorized as ethnically bound or acculturated with  nothing in-between  as cited by O'Guinn and Faber (1985).
    There has  been progress in rectifying this fallacious conceptualization.  Hair  (1973, 1975) devised a measure of consumer acculturation and later  refined it for  black consumers. Chang (1972) included a third  "bicultural" category. Kim (1979)  viewed ethnicity and acculturation as  anchor points along a continuum so that an  individual may be perceived  as being more or less acculturated at any given point in time.   O'Guinn, Faber, and Meyer (1984) proposed an alternative  conceptualization of  acculturation by utilizing role theory in which  individuals may be at different levels of  acculturation for the  different roles they assume. For example, an individual may   behave in accord with his or her ethnic norms when at home with other  family members but  may adopt the cultural norms and behavior of the  host society at work or school.
    For the most part, though, research has been based on ethnicity and  acculturation as part of a linear concept. For example, Valencia (1985) uses an  index of "Hispanicness" which goes from high "Hispanicness" to low  "Hispanicness" to whites. However, research by Ellis  et al. (1985) on  "Chineseness" points out that an ethnic group can  hold values more closely  linked with the dominant cultural values and  members of the dominant cultural groups can  rank high on the  value-based measures of an ethnic group.
    Research  on the ways blacks have come to assert pride in ethnic identity  has  also been characterized as linear. Cross (1978) uses the term  11psychological  nigrescence," or the process of becoming black. Cross  (1973) identifies four stages  of black-identity development:  PreEncounter, Encounter, immersion, and Internalization.  This process  involves developing a sense of self and personal worth that explicitly  takes its reference points from  a perspective of Afro-American history and  consciousness, rather than  primarily from the frame of reference toward oneself and blacks   dictated by white society (Jenkins 1982). Thomas and Thomas (1971)  developed independently  a model similar to the Cross model. The Thomas  and Thomas model reviewed the stages of  blacks moving from "negromachy"  to seeking racial identity. Milliones (1980)  posited four stages of  Preconscious, Confrontation, Internalization, and Integration,  which  represent the different values and belief systems of blacks, similar to  the process  models of Cross and Thomas and Thomas.
    The  difficulty with the above conceptualizations is that they do not allow   room for multiculturalism. They assume that an individual can display  only the behavior of  one culture. Yet Ramirez and Castaneda (1974)  cogently show that there can be a cultural  democracy. An individual can  strongly identify with his or her ethnic group and still  exhibit the  ideals and values of a dominant culture.
    For  example, McFee (1968) identified multicultural orientations to life   among some members of the Blackfeet Indian tribe living in a bicultural  reservation  community, providing both Anglo and Indian cultural models.  Because these individuals  developed and expanded a behavioral  repertoire representing both cultures, McFee labeled  these bicultural  people the "150% person."
    Valentine's research  (1971) with black American youth in urban centers  also identified  subjects with multicultural orientations to life. Valentine observed  that  there was a great deal of flexibility in these multicultural  subjects, noting that  "each Afro-American ethnic segment draws upon a  distinctive repertoire of  standardized Afro-American behavior, and  simultaneously, patterns derived from mainstream  cultural systems of  Euro-American derivation."
    Not only is there  evidence that blacks display multicultural behavior, but  Mendoza (1984)  suggests that being multicultural may be in the best interest of an  ethnic  group. He states that being monocultural in a multicultural  environment can actually be  more dysfunctional than being multicultural  in a monocultural situation, and cites studies  to back up this point.  Zea (1974) even went so far as to suggest that multiculturalism is  the  vehicle by which oppressed peoples could escape the dependency that has  been imposed  upon them, with multicultural individuals acting as change  agents between members of the  cultures with which they interact.
    AFRICAN AND EUROPEAN ROOTS
    Most  social science researchers agree that when blacks were brought to   America as slaves they also brought with them a cultural background  regarded as highly  sophisticated. There is, however, controversy as to  whether there are African survivals in  the present day behavior of  American blacks (Wilcox 1971).
    Some scholars have  held the view that the African heritage was all but  obliterated by the  institution of slavery. Frazier (1939) all but discounted the relevance   of Africa in his analyses of black family life, arguing that because  blacks and whites  have been compatriots for over three hundred years  their present culture and behavior are  identical.
    Other  scholars hold that there are significant vestiges of the African   heritage in American black culture, although it is admitted that there  has been distortion  in some instances, but by no means has the African  heritage been totally wiped out. DuBois  (1908) observed concerning the  African antecedents of the patterns developed in America  that in cases  where the present conditions were connected with the African past, this  was  not because blacks could trace an unbroken social history from  Africa, but because there  was a distinct connection between Africa and  American blacks, though broken and perverted,  that should not be  neglected by the serious scholar. DuBois noted, though, that the   connection may have represented only traces due to the effectiveness of  the slave system  in practically devastating the transfusion of the  African heritage.
    African-based values and  mainstream American middle class values based on  European roots form  the basis for the concept of multiculturalism displayed by American   blacks. Conventionally, these two sets of beliefs are referred to as   "traditional" versus "modern" beliefs and values. Castaneda (1977)   indicates these two sets of values determines how one perceives the  universe, the  environment, and humanity's relations to them.
    The  African and European perspectives can be discussed across several   dimensions, including the mind-body dualism, the superiority or lack of  superiority of the  rational process, oral-auditory versus the  visual-written tradition, time management,  concept of the future,  individualism versus collective survival, control of the universe,  and  immortality.
    The European frame of reference has  historically placed emphasis on rugged  individualism, competition, and  achievement motivation within a future oriented context  (McClelland  1961). Boykin (1983) describes the European based American cultural  values as  centering around effort optimism, material well-being,  possessive individualism,  egalitarian-based conformity, the  democratization of equality, and a person-to-object  orientation.
    The  African perspective tends to focus on a rhythmic-music-movement   orientation, an emphasis on affect, communalism, expressive  individualism, a social time  perspective, orality, and a  person-to-person orientation (Boykin 1983).
    Boykin  (1983) argues that it would be inappropriate to conclude that   traditional African views and values have been transferred wholesale  into the life  experiences of American blacks, completely intact,  unmitigated, and untransformed. He also  states that it is unlikely that  no meaningful cultural correspondences exist. He  identifies nine  realms or dimensions that manifest themselves in American black behavior   that grew out of the belief system and orientation of traditional  African society. They  are the following:
              1. Spirituality: approaching life as though its primary essence were      vitalistic rather than mechanistic. 
      2. Harmony: seeing oneself as inextricably linked to one's surroundings. 
      3. Movement: the interwoven mosaic of movement, music, dance, rhythm, etc.      
      4. Verve: disdain for the routinized, the dull, and the bland. 
      5. Affect: integration of feelings with thoughts and actions. 
      6. Communalism: awareness of the interdependence of people. 
      7. Expressive Individualism: putting one's personal brand on an activity. 
      8. Orality: special sensitivity to oral expression to carry meaning. 
      9.  Social Time Perspective: construing time primarily in terms of the       significance of events and not to be bound to the clock.
    
  
    A  number of empirical studies provide support for this dichotomy of   African and European roots in the behavior of different cultures. Graham  (1981) shows how  ethnic background can affect perception of time,  while Belk (1984) recognizes the  differences in group-based versus  individual-based orientations between cultural groups  and the impact on  consumer behavior.
    Reflecting the view of the  African tradition, blacks should put more  emphasis on peer acceptance,  be more people oriented rather than individual oriented, put  a heavy  emphasis on affective responses in conjunction with cognitive responses,  and  display participatory behavior.
    Cosmas and  Sheth (1980) found that blacks were more responsive to opinion  leaders  ranking high on the dimension of peer influence and charisma.  Silverstein and  Krate (1975) reported on several studies showing blacks  being more feeling oriented, more  auditory and tactile rather than  visual and written oriented, and better at acting out and  interpreting  the emotions of various actors.
    Hedegard and  Brown (1969) found that black students characterize their  ideal teacher  in terms of interpersonal prowess as opposed to technical proficiency.  In  the area of group versus individual orientation, Slavin (1983) in  numerous studies has  shown that black students learn significantly  better in cooperative, group situations  compared to white students, who  learned better in individual, competitive situations. He  hypothesizes  that this may be due to the greater importance of peer groups among  blacks.  Sims (1979) examined black children and their sharing behavior  and found a significant  emphasis on the importance of the reference  group for these children.
    Rychlak (1977)  developed an operational measure of affective assessment  called  "reinforcement value" (RV). He found that black subjects were more   influenced by RV considerations in their learning behavior. He suggests  that the  RVlearning style for blacks may reflect the strong tendencies  within the culture to  emphasize the basic human affective assessment  propensities.
    A SIMPLIFIED MODEL OF THE MULTICULTURAL CONCEPT
    Ramirez  (1984) points out that the acculturation models which have  influenced  most of the research of social scientists with respect to members of  ethnic  groups could properly be called "conflict-replacement" models.  They are based on  the assumptions that 1.) the value-belief systems and  life-styles of the ethnic group will  be replaced with those of the  mainstream culture, and 2.) as the individual becomes more  assimilated  into the mainstream culture, he or she experiences less conflict and  more  success. Under this conceptualization, the multicultural  individual is viewed as being  assimilated.
    A  multicultural approach to acculturation is better conceptualized as a   "flexibilitysynthesis" model. According to Ramirez (1977), this  represents a  synthesis experience, or the bringing together o-f  different cultural modules to arrive at  a new combination of elements  that make the individual a functioning multicultural.
    The  model for blacks in America is represented by a two-dimensional   matrix. The vertical axis represents orientation toward European-based, "modern"  values, while the horizontal axis  represents orientation towards  African-based, "traditional" values. This results  in four quadrants  which are labeled as follows:
              1.  Multiculturals (High Traditional and High Modern Values) - Blacks who       have reached cultural democracy and can display both African-based  and European-based      values in their behavior.
      2.  Assimilables (Low Traditional and High Modern Values) - Blacks who       display European-based values and who have been acculturated in the  traditional sense.
      3. Transitionals (Low  Traditional and Low Modern Values) - Blacks who have      given up  African-based values but have not adopted European-based values.
      4.  Identifiers (High Traditional and Low Modern Values) - Blacks who       display primarily African-based values in their behavior.
    
  
    Some  researchers have argued that "traditional" values among  ethnic groups  are a declining part of American society. However, this view is   characteristic of the "conflict-replacement" view of acculturation.  Based on the  above "flexibility-synthesis" model, it is hypothesized  that Multiculturals,  representing both "traditional" and "modern"  values, are a growing  segment within ethnic groups. Further research,  including the development of scales to  measure subjects along the two  dimensions, is needed to support this hypothesis.
    MARKETING IMPLICATIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH
    Accepting  the "flexibility-synthesis" model of multiculturalism  in understanding  the consumer behavior of American blacks can help to explain much of  the  confusion that has surrounded the question of cultural integration  versus distinctiveness.  The answer is that blacks can be cultural  integrated and distinct, and it does not have to  be an "either/or"  issue. Although there are a number of implications and  opportunities  for further marketing research using the concept, only two areas will be   briefly discussed.
    The first is the growing  emphasis in America on values and lifestyle  perspectives of consumer  behavior. Values and Life Styles (VALS), a typology of the  American  consumer created by Mitchell (1978), is being adopted by many marketers.  As a  result of this emphasis on self-images, aspirations, and product  use, a number of terms  have crept into the marketing parlance. For  example, Young Urban Professionals (YUPPIES),  Young Upwardly Mobile  Professionals (YUMPPIES), Spoiled Kids of the Eighties (SKOTIES or   YUPPY children), Fun Loving Youths En Route to Success (FLYERS) are just  a few. Now the  terms BUPPIES and BUMPPIES have cropped up. These are  Black Urban Professionals and Black  Upwardly Mobile Professionals. They  are the direct result of middle class acceptance  (Smith 1985). At one  time middle class was viewed as suspicious, representing a loss of   identity, "the bourgeois" (Frazier 1957). Previously the "black   bourgeois" was viewed as trying to act like whites. Now the BUPPIES are  showing  whites how to act (Smith 1985).- They rep-resent blacks who  maintain a strong cultural  identity, often forming ethnic groups within  their corporations and creating dialogues  with management over  minority concerns, but still enjoying the "good life,"  based on  European-based values, They are the Multiculturals as described in the  above  model.
    Another area involves the use of  Black English in advertising to reach  blacks. Sobers (1979) says it is a  myth that blacks respond more to "slanguage"  in advertising than to  conventional English. Yet Smitherman and McGinnis (1977) argue that   black speech is adequate for linguistic, social, and intellectual  functions, and black  scholars should advocate its legitimacy and usage  in the home, on the job, in school, in  the media, and in all  institutional contexts. Labov (1985) conducted research that  indicates  the language gap between whites and blacks is actually widening,  particularly  among urban black youths. Many black leaders maintain that  the perpetuation of the black  dialect to foster racial distinctiveness  is illogical, nonsensical, and harmful to  building a better future for  blacks as cited by Brasch (1981). Putting this issue in a   multicultural context might open new avenues to understanding how  linguistic expressions  peculiar to the black culture could be adopted  while at the same time fostering the use of  conventional English. This  could be useful to advertisers developing campaigns aimed at  blacks.
    CONCLUSION
    The  marketer is faced with the task of selecting appropriate marketing   strategies to reach blacks, a sizeable ethnic segment with significant  purchasing power.  Previous research has not been clear on whether  blacks desire to be assimilated into the  mainstream culture or desire  to be treated as culturally distinct. Much of this  discrepancy has been  due to the linear models of acculturation employed. Multiculturalism   with its emphasis on cultural democracy is used as the basis to develop a  four cell matrix  based on "traditional" African and "modern" European  cultural values.  This approach opens the way to explore new approaches  and develop new theories about  effective marketing programs to reach  blacks.
    REFERENCES
    Andreasen, Alan R. (1978), "The Ghetto Marketing Life Cycle: A Case  of Underachievement," Journal of Marketing Research, 25 (February), 20-28.
    Barry, Thomas E., Michael G. Harvey and Michael E. McGill, eds. (1976), Marketing  and the Black Consumer: An Annotated Bibliography., Chicago: American Marketing  Association.
    Bauer, Raymond A. and Scott M. Cunningham (1970), "The Negro  Market," Journal of Advertising Research, 10 (April), 3-13.
    Bauer, Raymond A., Scott M. Cunningham, and L. H. Wortzel (1965),  "The Marketing Dilemma of Negroes," Journal of Marketing, July, 1-6.
    Belk,  Russell W. (1984), "Cultural and Historical Differences in  Concepts of  Self and Their Effects on Attitudes Toward Having and Giving, in Thomas  C.  Kinnear, ed., Advances in Consumer Research Volume XI, Provo, Utah: Association for  Consumer Research.
    Bennett, P. D. and Harold H. Kassarjian (1972), Consumer Behavior,  Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
    Blauner, Robert (1972), Racial Repression in America, New York:  Harper and Row.
    Boykin, A. Wade (1983), "The Academic Performance of Afro-American  Children," in Janet T. Spence, ed., Achievement and Achievement Motives: Psychological  and Sociological Approaches, San Francisco: Company.
    W. H. Freeman and Brasch, Walter M. (1981), Black English and the Mass  Media, Amherst: U. Mass Press.
    Bullock, Henry A. (1961), "Consumer Motivations in Black and White -  I and II," Harvard Business Review, 39 (May-June), 89-104; 39 (July-August),  110-124.
    Castaneda, Alfredo (1977), "Traditionalism, Modernism, and  Ethnicity," in J. L. Martinez, Jr., ed., Chicano Psychology, New York:  Academic Press.
    Chang,  W. H. (1972), "Communication and Acculturation: A Case Study  of Korean  Ethnic Group in Los Angeles," unpublished Ph.D. dissertation,  University of  Iowa.